Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE
Vol. 27, No. 4, July-August 2008, pp. 730-744
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1070.0326
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geylani, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hofstede, F. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Image Reinforcement or Impairment: The Effects of Co-Branding on Attribute Uncertainty

Tansev Geylani, J. Jeffrey Inman, Frenkel Ter Hofstede

Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712

tgeylani{at}katz.pitt.edu
jinman{at}katz.pitt.edu
terhofstedef{at}mccombs.utexas.edu

Co-branding is often used by companies to reinforce the image of their brands. In this paper, we investigate the conditions under which a brand's image is reinforced or impaired as a result of co-branding, and the characteristics of a good partner for a firm considering co-branding for image reinforcement. We address these issues by conceptualizing attribute beliefs as two-dimensional constructs: The first dimension reflects the expected value of the attribute, while the second dimension reflects the degree of certainty about the attribute. We argue that these parameters are updated after consumers are exposed to a co-branding activity, and we develop an analytical model that incorporates these notions. An analysis of the model leads to several propositions, which we test in an experiment. Our findings indicate that it is not necessarily in a brand's best interest to choose an alliance partner that is of the highest performance possible. Moreover, we find that, while expected values of the brand attributes may improve as a result of co-branding, under certain conditions the uncertainty associated with the brands increases through the alliance. Implications for co-branding researchers and practitioners are discussed.

Key Words: brand alliances; spillover effects; co-branding; image reinforcement; brand positioning
History: Received: July 1, 2005;





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by INFORMS.