Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE
Vol. 28, No. 1, January-February 2009, pp. 166-179
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1080.0384
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golder, P. N.
Right arrow Articles by Mitra, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Findings—Innovations' Origins: When, By Whom, and How Are Radical Innovations Developed?

Peter N. Golder, Rachel Shacham, Debanjan Mitra

Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York 10012
Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York 10012
Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611

pgolder{at}stern.nyu.edu
rshacham{at}stern.nyu.edu
deb.mitra{at}cba.ufl.edu

Innovation research tends to consider only the post-commercialization period or examine a few innovations through case studies. In this study, we examine 29 radical innovations from initial concept to mass-market commercialization. We find that these innovations were developed over an average of at least 50 years and divide this long development period into four distinct stages—conceptualization, gestation, early incubation, and late incubation. We find that the duration of a stage is longer when different firms lead product development at the beginning and end of the stage. These changes in product development leaders happen frequently, e.g., 76% of firms that were first to commercialize an innovation failed to launch it in the broader market. We also find that the time-to-takeoff for a product category is significantly related to the duration of the preceding late incubation stage. In addition, we find four different ways in which radical innovations borrow from prior seemingly unrelated innovations. We report many other findings on when (duration times), by whom (product development leaders), and how (technology borrowing) radical innovations are developed.

Key Words: innovation; new product research; high-tech marketing; product development; speed-to-market; radical innovation; really new products
History: Received: October 13, 2006; accepted: November 17, 2007.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.