Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE,
Published online in Articles in Advance, March 18, 2009
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1080.0466
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allenby, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

A Model for Trade-Up and Change in Considered Brands

Greg M. Allenby, Mark J. Garratt, Peter E. Rossi

Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
In4mation Insights, Needham, Massachusetts 02494
Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637

allenby.1{at}osu.edu
mgarratt{at}in4ins.com
peter.rossi{at}chicagogsb.edu

A common theme in marketing literature is the acquisition and retention of customers as they trade up from inexpensive introductory offerings to those of higher quality. We develop a nonhomothetic choice model to accommodate effects of advertising, professional recommendation, and other factors that facilitate the description and management of trade up. Our model allows advertising to affect the relative superiority or inferiority of products. This allows for a wide variety of trade-up patterns beyond those obtained from a standard random utility formulation of the logit model. Our nonhomothetic model allows for advertising to affect more than just brand intercepts (perceived quality), but also the rate at which consumers are willing to trade up to higher quality brands. Advertising effects are measured using a randomized treatment and evaluated by considering their direct implications for firm pricing and profits.

Key Words: nonhomothetic utility; advertising; quality; discrete choice
History: Received: February 12, 2008; accepted: September 15, 2008.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.