Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE,
Published online in Articles in Advance, June 19, 2009
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1090.0490
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aribarg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kang, M. Y.

Predicting Joint Choice Using Individual Data

Anocha Aribarg, Neeraj Arora, Moon Young Kang

Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Wisconsin School of Business, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Wisconsin School of Business, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

anocha{at}umich.edu
narora{at}bus.wisc.edu
mkang{at}bus.wisc.edu

Choice decisions in the marketplace are often made by a collection of individuals or a group. Examples include purchase decisions involving families and organizations. A particularly unique aspect of a joint choice is that the group's preference is very likely to diverge from preferences of the individuals that constitute the group. For a marketing researcher, the biggest hurdle in measuring group preference is that it is often infeasible or cost prohibitive to collect data at the group level. Our objective in this research is to propose a novel methodology to estimate joint preference without the need to collect joint data from the group members. Our methodology makes use of both stated and inferred preference measures, and merges experimental design, statistical modeling, and utility aggregation theories to capture the psychological processes of preference revision and concession that lead to the joint preference. Results based on a study involving a cell phone purchase for 214 parent-teen dyads demonstrate predictive validity of our proposed method.

Key Words: joint decision making; preference revision; utility aggregation; Bayesian
History: Received: March 7, 2008; accepted: January 24, 2009.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.