Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE,
Published online in Articles in Advance, September 22, 2009
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1090.0518
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hartmann, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nair, H. S.

Retail Competition and the Dynamics of Demand for Tied Goods

Wesley R. Hartmann, Harikesh S. Nair

Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

hartmann_wesley{at}gsb.stanford.edu
harikesh.nair{at}stanford.edu

We present a demand system for tied goods incorporating dynamics arising from the tied nature of the products and the stockpiling induced by storability and durability. We accommodate competition across tied good systems and competing downstream retail formats by endogenizing the retail format at which consumers choose to stockpile inventory. This facilitates measurement of long-run retail substitution effects and yields estimates of complementarities within, and substitution across, competing systems of tied goods. We present an empirical application to an archetypal tied goods category: razors and blades. We discuss the implications of measured effects for manufacturer pricing when selling the tied products through an oligopolistic downstream retail channel and assess the extent to which retail substitution reduces channel conflict.

Key Words: tied goods; retail competition; dynamic discrete choice; durable good replacement; endogenous consumption; long-run effects; vertical channels; razor blade market
History: Received: December 11, 2007; accepted: May 14, 2009.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.