Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE,
Published online in Articles in Advance, September 22, 2009
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1090.0524
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, N.
Right arrow Articles by Narasimhan, O.

Examining Demand Elasticities in Hanemann's Framework: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis

Nitin Mehta, Xinlei (Jack) Chen, Om Narasimhan

Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6, Canada
Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z2, Canada
Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

nmehta{at}rotman.utoronto.ca
jack.chen{at}sauder.ubc.edu
naras002{at}umn.edu

This paper examines demand elasticities using an integrated framework proposed by Hanemann [Hanemann, M. W. 1984. Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand. Econometrica 52(3) 541–561], which models the incidence, brand choice, and quantity decisions of a consumer as an outcome of her utility maximization subject to budget constraints. Although the Hanemann framework has been the mainstay of earlier efforts to examine these decisions jointly, empirical researchers who have used the it to study purchase behavior have often found that the quantity elasticities are around -1, regardless of the brand or category. We attempt to uncover the underlying reasons for this finding and propose approaches to get as close to the "true" quantity elasticities as possible. We do this by (i) analytically demonstrating how assumptions on the distribution of the brand-specific econometrician's errors imply certain restrictions that in turn force quantity elasticities to -1, (ii) discussing how these restrictions can be alleviated by considering a suitable specification of unobserved parameter heterogeneity, and (iii) using scanner data to empirically illustrate the impact of the restrictions on quantity elasticities and the relative efficacy of multiple specifications of unobserved heterogeneity in easing those restrictions. We find that the specification of unobserved heterogeneity crucially influences estimates of quantity elasticities and that the mixture normal specification outperforms the alternatives.

Key Words: microeconomic theory of demand; quantity elasticities; Hanemann's framework; stochastic properties of distribution functions of econometrician's errors; stochastic properties of finite mixture/normal random/mixture normal specifications of heterogeneity; structural approach
History: Received: March 3, 2008; accepted: June 15, 2009.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.